This is the same rubric mentors and reviewers use. Read it before writing your final ethics section.
| Dimension | Marks | What It Requires |
|---|---|---|
| Identification | 0–1 | Name at least two specific ethical concerns that apply to your agent. Generic statements ('AI can be biased') do not count. Specifics do ('our agent trained on English data may fail for non-native speakers'). |
| Analysis | 0–2 | Explain why each concern matters in your specific context. Consider the actual users, not hypothetical ones. |
| Design Response | 0–1 | For each concern — describe a specific design decision you made to address it. 'We thought about it' is not a design response. 'We added a human review step before any message is sent to a patient' is. |
| Honest Limitations | 0–1 | Acknowledge what you could not fix within the time and scope — and what you would address next if you had more time. |
Four weeks ago you had an idea. Now you have a working prototype with documentation and ethics review.
Share your reflection, ask a question, or leave a comment. Your mentor will respond.
You need to be logged in to submit your reflection.
Lesson 1.1 and beyond are available to enrolled members. Join the program for free to access all 21+ lessons, mentor sessions, and your completion certificate.
🎓 Join the Program — It's FreeAlready a member? Log in